<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear Lawyers &amp; Librarians: The Kindle (or other eReader) is not your future.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasnwilsn.com/2009/07/17/dear-lawyers-librarians-the-kindle-or-other-ereader-is-not-your-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasnwilsn.com/2009/07/17/dear-lawyers-librarians-the-kindle-or-other-ereader-is-not-your-future/</link>
	<description>Thoughts about law, publishing, and technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:35:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: @nickholmes</title>
		<link>http://www.jasnwilsn.com/2009/07/17/dear-lawyers-librarians-the-kindle-or-other-ereader-is-not-your-future/comment-page-1/#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>@nickholmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasnwilsn.com/?p=352#comment-500</guid>
		<description>Jason - How about an update? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason &#8211; How about an update?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are (law) ebooks the future? : Binary Law</title>
		<link>http://www.jasnwilsn.com/2009/07/17/dear-lawyers-librarians-the-kindle-or-other-ereader-is-not-your-future/comment-page-1/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>Are (law) ebooks the future? : Binary Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 11:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasnwilsn.com/?p=352#comment-332</guid>
		<description>[...] But I&#8217;ve always been sceptical of the value of ebooks for law. For novels and other linear reading they clearly work well. But law books are different aren&#8217;t they? We dip into them, approach them via indexes etc, jump back and forth and put bookmarks and sticky notes on them; and they&#8217;re constantly being updated. I&#8217;ve long held that ebooks are not the future of law books or rather that the future law book is not a book, and others agree that law books belong in the cloud. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But I&#8217;ve always been sceptical of the value of ebooks for law. For novels and other linear reading they clearly work well. But law books are different aren&#8217;t they? We dip into them, approach them via indexes etc, jump back and forth and put bookmarks and sticky notes on them; and they&#8217;re constantly being updated. I&#8217;ve long held that ebooks are not the future of law books or rather that the future law book is not a book, and others agree that law books belong in the cloud. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jasnwilsn</title>
		<link>http://www.jasnwilsn.com/2009/07/17/dear-lawyers-librarians-the-kindle-or-other-ereader-is-not-your-future/comment-page-1/#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>jasnwilsn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasnwilsn.com/?p=352#comment-501</guid>
		<description>I\&#039;ll see what I can crank out over the weekend. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I\&#8217;ll see what I can crank out over the weekend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

