<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WestlawNext Review: Ending the tyranny of the keyword?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasnwilsn.com/2010/01/28/westlawnext-review-ending-the-tyranny-of-the-keyword/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasnwilsn.com/2010/01/28/westlawnext-review-ending-the-tyranny-of-the-keyword/</link>
	<description>Thoughts about law, publishing, and technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:23:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: On the Last Day of Legal Research Class &#8211; andrew.plumb-larrick</title>
		<link>http://www.jasnwilsn.com/2010/01/28/westlawnext-review-ending-the-tyranny-of-the-keyword/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>On the Last Day of Legal Research Class &#8211; andrew.plumb-larrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasnwilsn.com/?p=1097#comment-36</guid>
		<description>[...] which we saw the expansion of Google Scholar results to cover case law and had our first glimpse of Westlaw Next. One theme I try to get across to the students is that we now work in a research environment (in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which we saw the expansion of Google Scholar results to cover case law and had our first glimpse of Westlaw Next. One theme I try to get across to the students is that we now work in a research environment (in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Immodest Premium for WestlawNext &#124; legalresearchandwritingpro.com</title>
		<link>http://www.jasnwilsn.com/2010/01/28/westlawnext-review-ending-the-tyranny-of-the-keyword/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>The Immodest Premium for WestlawNext &#124; legalresearchandwritingpro.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasnwilsn.com/?p=1097#comment-5</guid>
		<description>[...] Comparing my current plan to the WestlawNext proposals revealed that West would be charging an 11% premium for the power to search with the WestlawNext algorithm in the same database (All Cases &amp; Statutes NY Gold with Regs Plus Database). While I believe that West shouldn&#8217;t charge its current subscribers anything to &#8220;upgrade&#8221; to WestlawNext, an 11% increase is in line with the pre-launch prediction offered by Jason Eiseman, Tom Boone, Greg Lambert and Jason Wilson. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comparing my current plan to the WestlawNext proposals revealed that West would be charging an 11% premium for the power to search with the WestlawNext algorithm in the same database (All Cases &amp; Statutes NY Gold with Regs Plus Database). While I believe that West shouldn&#8217;t charge its current subscribers anything to &#8220;upgrade&#8221; to WestlawNext, an 11% increase is in line with the pre-launch prediction offered by Jason Eiseman, Tom Boone, Greg Lambert and Jason Wilson. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
